290)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
You amaze me. I read many stories and posts on Propeller and am amazed at what a Leftist schill you really are. You'd rather find an opportunity to take a jab at anything smacking of Conservative values than deal with the reality of the illegal immigration problem. Much more serious than a few drugged terrorists.
Can you show anything in the article that says the people who were drugged are terrorists?
No, because it doesn't say that.
Not only that, but one of them had an appeals process underway. In other words, we don't know for sure that that person should have been deported at all.
They are here illegally. If you don't have legal resident status, you are subject to deportation.
Oh I see. Everyone who breaks the law is now a terrorist.
Terrorists and criminals are interchangeable terms.
Better watch out--next time you don't come to a complete stop at a a stop sign, you might wind up in Guantanamo.
I'm not a foreign terrorist so I'm not worried. You, on the other hand...
I know you aren't literal in most of your posts here, so I don't always take you entirely seriously, but the intent of your comments is clear.
Your logic demands that all criminals are terrorists. There is no mention of terrorism in this article about deportees being drugged. You say they're criminals, and call them terrorists because of it. And you see no reason for them to be able to argue in any way or appeal their cases.
You really might want to start worrying about driving over the limit. Especially--God forbid--if the Democrats get all that unchecked and secretive power Bush has had. ;-)