It's Occupation, Not War »

Posted by: populist 3 months, 1 week ago

10 CommentsReflectReport this Story

1.0

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 1

Propped: 67

Comments: 10

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ended some years ago. In Iraq, the war ended with the fall of Saddam Hussein's government; in Afghanistan, with the fall of the Taliban government. What's been happening since is occupation and resistance to occupation.

Read Full Story at antiwar.com

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 10
  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    libsRfunny
    libsRfunny
    April 12, 2008, 11:03 p.m.

    "In Iraq, the war ended with the fall of Saddam Hussein's government"

    Good to see the non-existent "Populist" party agrees that Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the refeat-and-surrender caucus were full of crap when the proclaimed the war in Iraq lost not even a year ago.

    1 ReplyReply | Report!

  • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

    crghss
    crghss
    April 12, 2008, 11:46 p.m.

    Hey Populist, whats your cut of that donation?

    Reply | Report!

    • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

      Candida
      Candida
      April 13, 2008, 12:35 a.m.

      I agree with most of the article and really like when people call things by their proper names. I have to take issue with one sentence, however. The article says:

      "We should never go to war unless there are tangible, identifiable benefits for the American people for doing so."

      In my view, identifiable benefits are not sufficient to go to war. The author perhaps meant "Identifiable benefit" as necessary rather than a sufficient, but it's not clear enough. Some wars of aggression may have benefits for the aggressor, but that doesn't justify them. No country should go to war unless it's absolutely necessary to repel clear aggression by another country.

      Reply | Report!

      • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

        Amazing1
        Amazing1
        April 13, 2008, 7:49 a.m.

        It was always a wrong headed invasion. Iraq had done nothing to warrant our invasion. There were no WMD. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant to be sure. But what business is that of ours. The real reason for the invasion and subsequent occupation has more to do with oil and nearly zero about our security. And these are occupations, not wars. They should be terminated ASAP. That would do more to improve our relationship with the Middle East that almost anything else we could do. In addition, it would save lives and money.

        Reply | Report!

        • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

          vctoriasecret
          vctoriasecret
          April 13, 2008, 10:18 a.m.

          great topic and article. Thanks!

          Reply | Report!

          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

            tchef
            tchef
            April 13, 2008, 10:24 a.m.

            I disagree about our invasion of Afganistan. We had just cause for invading that country, the government was aiding and supporting Al Quiada, (or however you spell it this week) and Osama Bin Ladin. We should have finished the job there. They supported a massive attack on our country. And when they refused to turn over Osama, they warranted our attack.

            1 ReplyReply | Report!

          • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

            hyperbola
            hyperbola
            April 13, 2008, 3:46 p.m.

            Notes From The Iraqi Resistance...

            Transcript of an interview with M.Al-Shammari, ( head of the Islamic Army of Iraq/IAI )

            1) Words of Introduction by Al-Shammari â;; in response to a question re.the surge and the IR.

            Petraeus did not make any progress in Iraq. This is nothing but another lie in the series of lies started by Bush with his WMD's. There is no progress.

            The Resistance has not changed its strategy which is the end of the occupation..

            The Resistance did change its tactics but not its strategy. The Americans are desperate for some calm before the November elections, but the Resistance will decide when to implement an upsurge in its attacks against the occupier, maybe during certain "crucial moments" but this is up to the Resistance to decide when and how.

            ...

            For us Victory means totally Victory - the End of the Occupation(s)

            http://arabwomannews.blogspot.com/2008/04/notes...

            Reply | Report!

            • Avg rating: (+0/-0 0)

              Fedquip
              Fedquip
              April 13, 2008, 7:42 p.m.

              It's funny cause its true...wait..thats not funny.

              Reply | Report!

              You must sign in to post a comment.

              Submitted By:
              populist

              The essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite ...

              Also submitted:

              Related Articles:

              Why not submit a story?

              Also Propping This Article

              view all »

              Groups Watching This

              No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

              Advertisement

              Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback