Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

Larry Sinclair: Welfare Recipient? »

Posted by: jovial 6 months, 3 weeks ago

9.7

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 148

Propped: 114

Comments: 468

Click Prop It to Raise Score

Prop it

The man who claims to have done all sorts of things with Senator Barack Obama in the back of a limo in 1999 in Chicago, is on welfare? Maybe we have a motive for his malicious, fallacious, attack.

Read Full Story at dearmurray.com

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment

Comments So Far: 468

0%
jovial6 months, 3 weeks ago

Well it appears that this guy's a kook. I think he needs help. I also think that those that ever fell for the story in the first place could use some professional help as well.
Reply
47 Replies
- 0%
  Aidenag6 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  The guy is a scam artist, and everyone knows it. As people have been saying for a while now, IF these accusations from a drug addict had any credibility, the Republican party, foxnews, rush limbaugh, Anne Coulter and so on, would be jumping all over them to discredit Obama and the DNC..
  Instead the only sites talking about this bs, are places like WorldnetDaily. Which is a site known for such top notch reporting as claiming that the US govt shot down one of the planes on 9/11(aka 9/11 truthers). and that Soy is making kids gay....
  I really do not get how people can keep buying into WND's 'reporting'. They are just a right wing conservative version of the National Enquirer.
  Reply
  24 Replies
  - 0%
    Aidenag6 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    Just found out Larry Sinclair gave an interview to Jeff Rense of rense.com the uber anti-semetic, bush and jews are behind 9/11, aliens are probing us, paranormal phenomena, conspiracy website as well.. They are the biggest joke on the net, and many web filters block the site for its blatent anti-semetic rants. Says a lot about Larry Sinclair that he would associate himself with these type of people...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Rense
    Reply
    20 Replies
    - 0%
      GWHayduke6 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      -"Says a lot about Larry Sinclair that he would associate himself with these type of people..."-
      Not to mention those who would propogate and support the blatant smearing.
      I wonder, RedRiverJ, is worldnet.org part of the 'liberal press' that so maligns the neo-conservative effort?
      Now I'm off to dailymail.co.uk to extract some 'fair & balanced' news to post.
      
      Reply
      6 Replies
      - 0%
        crespi6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Aiden-
        Agree about Sinclair and Rense but I wouldn't write off the contradictions and overly numerous coincidences involved in 911 just yet...
        Reply
        5 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        I would. They are nutty and lack any factual basis.
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        0%
        Jaydee406 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Just like the GOP right Dropkick, got you there......
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        No, you haven't got anything there. Are you suggesting that the 9-11 conspiracy theories are true? Maybe I'm on to something.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        Jaydee406 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        The shrub went into Iraq with less evidence than the "truthers" have about 9/11. It's ironic don't you think?
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Actually no. His information on Iraq was the same information other world leaders had and they reached similar conclusions. We do know that much of the Iraqi airforce was buried in the desert and no one has been to Damascus so we don't know what weapons made it there.
        Reply
    - 0%
      Spadecaller6 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      WE have quite a few Larry Sinclairs here on Propeller too. Usally when I post a controversial article, I get a number of propeller-heads who claim the Jews are behind 9-11 and msm. I must admit that most people on Propeller either ignore the blatant anti-Semitism or excuse it. Fortunately, my closest friends acknowledge it.
      Regarding Obama, the attacks against him will get worse as he becomes more of a threat. Some people feel threatened because he is black, some because he is a democrat, and some becaue he is willing to confront the corruption of special interests.
      I still am concerned that Barack will be targeted by a sniper paid by an oil company, Haliburton, Blackwwater, or any number of the profiteers from the Iraq War. I'm sorry to have to admit this, but I am deeply troubled by what I have learned over the years about these "covert" operations.
      Most people do not even realize that he and his wife are fully aware of the risk that they are taking.
      Reply
      12 Replies
      - 0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        If he were a black Republican, he would be getting legions of death threats by now.
        Reply
      - 0%
        ghengisghan6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Much more likely that Hillary is behind these attacks....She wont let anything stand between her and 1600 Pensylvania Ave!
        Reply
        5 Replies
        
        0%
        Mdiar6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Its not Hillary. Its not Rove. Its Sinclair. He is behind his own attacks because he is a nut job. If it were Hillary or Rove it would be bigger news then a youtube video and a few blog references.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Hey maybe you're right and he's just a nut, like the one's that say Bush likes to Kill for profit
        Reply
        
        0%
        Spadecaller6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        ghengisghan
        NO... Hillary is not alone. They are now coming from the Republican camp. McCAin and his warmongering corporate machinery are getting nervous about his popularity. They have already sent out their attack dogs.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Spade you know if you keep talking like that someone may think to get a head start and try and target McCain,,,, I hope that's not your intent,,,, spread this hate filled fear about Obama being targeted for assassination,,,, I'd step lightly
        Reply
        
        0%
        Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Anyone who voted for that story is beyond help. Pathetic filth.
        Reply
      - 0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        WOW SPade that was some post even for you. Trying to spread love or fear with that?
        Reply
      - 0%
        bobo-in-texas6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Umm, you might want to stay away from suggesting Obama is going to be targeted by a sniper. The Secret Service may take an unwanted interest in you and your activities.
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        That's what I'm thinking BoBO,,,, free speech does have soe limits, especially when you use assassination in a post along with a presidential hopeful
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        bobo-in-texas6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Someone calling themselves Spadecaller speculating about the assassination of a prominent black man? Everybody better check to see if they have any white sheets missing.
        Reply
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        I agreed with you Bo Bo but I don't know where my post went,,,,, when you find it, please send me the socks I've lost in the drier over the years
        Reply
  - 0%
    libsRfunny6 months, 2 weeks ago
    
    "The guy is a scam artist, and everyone knows it. As people have been saying for a while now, IF these accusations from a drug addict had any credibility, the Republican party, foxnews, rush limbaugh, Anne Coulter and so on, would be jumping all over them to discredit Obama and the DNC.."
    If the allegations aren't true, it should be easy enough for Obama to prove him false. But, truth is an absolute defense against claims of libel/slander. Maybe Obama is hiding something, after all.
    
    Reply
    2 Replies
    - 0%
      ConquerorWyrm6 months, 2 weeks ago
      
      The burden of proof is on the accuser, is it not? Also, thinking strategically, it would be foolish for Obama to do anything but dismiss and ignore this rather than let such a distraction have it's way.
      Reply
    - 0%
      IcCaRus6 months, 2 weeks ago
      
      consRidiots-
      are you really THAT stupid? how do you prove a negative? obama is doing exactly what you do with garbage like this... you refuse to dignify it with an answer.
      grasping at pathetic straws like this shows how desperate cons are as they realize they are gonna get hammered in NOv.
      Reply
- 0%
  gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  Professional help, indeed.
  It makes one wonder if "American democracy" is a contradiction in terms.
  What happened to HONESTY, HONOUR and FAIR PLAY - let alone DECENCY..
  The US has some wonderful characteristics, though many of those have been severely challenged during the last few years.
  Its crap like this, and that people fall for it - and/or are willing to exploit it whether they honestly believe it or not - that makes the rest of the world wonder whether you're completely nuts, dangerously uneducated or absolutely lacking in common sense, ethics and taste.
  The only RELATIVELY polite diagnosis/excuse is that you're a young democracy; an unruly teenager on the world stage.
  The very WORST aspect is that this trial by innuendo and outright lies leaves a taint behind, regardless of the truth or falsehood involved. That's why people are still talking about swiftboating.
  Reply
  3 Replies
  - 0%
    PsychoHosebeast6 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    Actually, "the people that fall for it" really don't make any difference, because no one with any common sense would think it was the truth, and the "people that fall for it" only love it because it's what they want to hear--they're seldom, if ever, concerned with the truth as long as they agree with the bile being spewed. It doesn't change their minds on anything, they made up their minds long ago--let's face it, with those type of people, they don't have much of a mind to make up in the first place.
    Reply
    2 Replies
    - 0%
      Will13136 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      Actually, "the people that fall for it" really don't make any difference, because no one with any common sense would think it was the truth,
      ----
      you mean the same people that voted for Bush TWICE... fool me once...can't get fooled again..
      gave you a POS on OVERALL content..
      Reply
      1 Reply
      - 0%
        Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        I can't believe any decent human being would vote for that filth. Unbelievable to attack a man who stands for decency for all with worthless trash like that. Pathetic and inexcusable.
        
        Reply
- 0%
  MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  Too many people look to find bad things to believe about
  anyone who can be the leader we seek. This is why so many potential great leaders stay out of the political forum. They harm all of us with this ignorant, jealous and cruel attempt to take down anyone who they do not understand or are told will be bad for them. These methods come from evil people and are inflicted by their ignorant and uneducated followers.
  When is the last time you saw a Republican support education?
  Not say it, I mean really support it??
  They keep those red states dumber and dumber
  (They are actually GREY-Confederate states) and they can fool them every time. Education frees the mind!!
  That's why they hate professors, college students whose minds are fresh with ideas and belief in humanity.
  If they really believed in God, then they would allow
  all of us to strengthen the mind, which is a gift that God gave us to use..
  Reply
  14 Replies
  - 0%
    DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    Right, the educational system of the inner cities of NYC, LA and Chicago are a model of Liberal enlightenment.
    Reply
    2 Replies
    - 0%
      MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
      
      Do the math.
      There are more residents in large cities, hence more students to educate. This is not just another case where you can get away with finger pointing, bad mouthing and smirking.
      Let's deal with reality and strop this divisive nonsense already!
      That philosophy (for lack of a better term) is what has continued our suffering longer than need be.
      Reply
      1 Reply
      - 0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Your comments regarding the educational systems of red states were ignorant. There are no worse educational systems than those of some of the urban areas located in the blue states. I'm just calling you out on your sweeping generalizations and overall ignorance of the areas and educational systems you were describing. What's more divisive than categorizing and insulting millions of people comprising the populations of entire states? Get real yourself!
        Reply
  - 0%
    slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
    
    Coffee your first line was,,,,Too many people look to find bad things to believe about
    Then you proceeded to prove your own point with the rest of your post.
    Reply
    10 Replies
    - 0%
      Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago
      
      Yeah I gave him a neg because of his assumptions on the educational system of all red states and then stating that all red states sided with the Confederacy in the American Civil War. He sort of shot himself in the foot with that part if he was trying to state that red state voters are less intelligent. Maybe they are but he shouldn't the proceed to state a historical inaccuracy. If we aren't even going to include states that weren't states at the time I can find one red state, just off the top of my head, which sided with the Union in the Civil War. Oh, the red state that sided with the Union in the American Civil War was Missouri. Probably others, but that one is just off the top of my head.
      Reply
      6 Replies
      - 0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        RED states are 17 of the bottom 19 lowest educated states.
        Doubt me?
        Look for US high school test scores!
        They own the bottom 11..
        Mississippi, Texas, Alabama, Louisiana, South Carolina,
        Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky and West Virginia do not exactly lead a list of states committed to education..
        If you doubt that, again, check test scores and compare them to states that do make education a commitment..
        western Missouri is old as bad as them all..
        Oh yes..Save Kansas, those states tended to be the heart of slavery too..
        No??
        Reply
        5 Replies
        
        0%
        Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        That's fine. I was simply stating that your statement was riddled with historical inaccuracy if I interpreted it correctly. I was pointing out the irony of attacking an educational system while stating something untrue. Not all red states, that were states at the time of the American Civil War, sided with the Confederacy. I could of misinterpreted your statement of course.
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        you did, but I was not clear as I should be, so I apologize..
        I'll restate:
        ALL Confederate states were red states.
        NOT all red states were confederate states..
        
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        0%
        Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        That is not a problem and that is a correct statement. I myself was educated in south-central Missouri. My school, I'll go ahead and admit, was an anomaly for the region.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        blinkers6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Seems to me, Mdiar, from the little I've seen of your posts, your school did a wonderful job.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        IcCaRus6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Mdair
        no it wasnt. i was educated in the StLouis public schools almost 40 years ago (graduated in 76) and ill put my education and knowledge up against ANY1s no matter if they are the product of public OR private schools.
        
        Reply
    - 0%
      MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
      
      huh?
      I'm talking about the character assassination of people who can and have shown greatness..
      What are you talking about?
      Or, what do you think I was talking about?
      Reply
      2 Replies
      - 0%
        Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        If it is in reply to me, I am referring to this:
        "They keep those red states dumber and dumber
        (They are actually GREY-Confederate states)"
        My experience in this red state is very far from a negative when it comes to the education and its a red state that wasn't a gray Confederate state, like you at least implied in your post the red states were. I could have misunderstood, but you seemed to suggest that red state= Confederacy/Poor education. I was stating that not all red states will only offer poor education. I was also stating a historical fact that not all red states were gray states in 1861-1865. If I misunderstood then I apologize.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        you were right..
        Reply
- 0%
  libsRfunny6 months, 2 weeks ago
  
  "Well it appears that this guy's a kook. I think he needs help. I also think that those that ever fell for the story in the first place could use some professional help as well."
  So, let me see if I understand the "logic": People on Welfare are scam artists. He is on welfare. Therefore, he is a scam artist. Is that the syllogism at work??
  Hmmm .. maybe if Dems embraced conservative views on welfare reform, this guy wouldn't have a reason to allegedly lie about Obama.
  Boy, I know Aidenag is all upset about his hero getting negative press. Next thing you know, people will say Obama did drugs and was a goof-off in school. Ohhh wait, Obama said that about himself. Never mind.
  Reply
- 0%
  slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
  
  Why's that Jo Jo? I didn't buy it, but what is the difference of someone buying that story or say the 1500 stories about Bush that people belive first then wait and see if it pans out or not later?
  Reply
  1 Reply
  - AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.
0%
injest6 months, 2 weeks ago

"Well it appears that this guy's a kook. I think he needs help. I also think that those that ever fell for the story in the first place could use some professional help as well."
Agree, this guy sounds and looks like a nut. I read somewhere else he is willing to take a polygraph test.
I think, but Im not sure, that people who are nuts can pass the polygraph because they actually believe it to be true.

Reply
0%
tehranchik6 months, 3 weeks ago

Good job by jove!
Reply
0%
gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago

Distressing is that 117 of our members saw fit to dignify this sleazy shameful drivel with their positive votes and that this was the most commented-on story of the day with 774 comments - as of now.
117 poitive votes emanated from:
abntv
ankilla
lifestyler
mariogames
masterjody
RedRiverJ
MeanMotherUSA
PracticalAdWords
Letrouvere
moojkma
WebDiva1
junglelord
mcarpentry
TalkingCactus
mikerhoads
miohaka34
egxa
IceTi
icono1
ProudBlueTexan
macan
gobohoty
promqueen
crideos
abd1977
Feist1
lisabelle
Shannonyork
dandt1612
Wolfie2007
Harbeas
ind06
pc25
jowo
torhadnites
eyeillusion
Malverde
bbernie
sarmatt
charlyod
jonxblaze
gwenmac1234
GLee
vidman04
manifest
Spreadsheet
AlaKai
mojoxrisen
JessicaLaurie
gloriax
L8again
texangelwings
DropkickaLib
mazafaka
tanady
bugluver
HomeGMan
Mutainia
Helixbuilder
gorian
bha2007
BronxBomber
TheRealizer
joeblowe
splitrch
copper19899
dglspres
nitegarito
Reply
232 Replies
- 0%
  gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  bot25k
  CAT7
  cherev
  trater
  ecotourusa
  rdy2rck
  jmopinion
  vvv63vvv
  HitOdessit
  hurr1
  bobiks
  juicey08
  tanglang
  ivanphilip
  Hereigo
  Sandra_honestly
  CoolCrazyStuff
  daducha
  linna4linna
  Raiderwall
  digitalfever
  akhodiodi
  bizexpert
  MaryLynn_
  stephenhacking
  tennisbetsite
  anavrin
  monicachenoa
  hitandrun
  neer1010
  SenorCoconut
  spinning234
  Klarissa
  tanyc01
  Uzeri34789
  AlvinT
  zaph22
  NoSpinDave
  BillSmythe
  AlphaGnosis
  bubba2
  Stephen Johnson
  GHOSTWHOWALKS
  BusinessandFinance
  ranchhand
  birddog54
  Nixie
  MichaelRhodente
  CactusAnnie
  Reply
- 0%
  gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  Oddly enough, though the story is "credited" to redriverj, s/he appears to be one of the last people to vote for it.
  
  Reply
  230 Replies
  - 0%
    TheRealizer6 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    I didn't click on the thread because I approved or disapproved, I do it to put it on my participation page.
    I did not think that doing that indicated my feelings about the subject, I stand corrected.......
    Reply
    7 Replies
    - 0%
      1-2-Oscar6 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      The story got on MY "participation page" when I sank it. It was garbage.
      I did look at the thread, though, and when I saw that the most frequent participant in the lengthy "discussion" was goppy, I understood that it was nothing that a decent person would touch.
      Reply
      4 Replies
      - 0%
        SonOfTheMask6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        LOL...
        Reply
      - lovermanComment removed: User banned.2 Replies
        
        0%
        Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Don't vote for stories unless you are recommending them. You can comment on the thread as much as you like without voting them up. If you sink a story it does appear on your participation page (But it says sunk).
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        lovermanComment removed: User banned.
    - 0%
      PsychoHosebeast6 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      Unfortunately, that's how garbage like that article get boosted to the top of the list. It'll be on your participation page if you sink it, too. Unfortunately, a story isn't demoted through sinks.
      Reply
      1 Reply
      - 0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Some of these people just don't get it..
        You have people like alpha who actually get off on the story and its vitriol.
        It just shows you how many people still remain that are more motivated by hate than problem solving for our country.
        They sadden me, but do not surprise me.
        After reviewing Ghostwalkers posts I am reminded that he is in the "apologist" "let's cling on to our bad deeds and mistakes at the cost of our reputation" camp.
        They truly believe that it doesn't matter how many wrongs it does take to make a right..they're just staying the course..
        This story is the most prolific example of how pathetically they have fallen.
        We need them to remind us how diligent we must remain in our goal to BRING AMERICA BACK.. (that involves working TOGETHER) NOT supporting TRASH like this.
        They know what it was. They love it! (how un-American)All of a sudden they are using ACLU-speak, that supports Nazi marches in Skokie..as if they support those loonies! (how convenient)
        Reply
  - 0%
    MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    I have made a copy of this LIST OF SHAME..
    Only ProudBluetexan, rdy2rck and GHOSTWALKERS surprise me. The rest are either hit and run bigots, or just former Netscape moronic regulars, who we already know have no shame, but more sadly no brains..
    Unfortunately the Klan still lives as do people who are just filled with so much hate that they "get off" on this type of
    un-American and divisive crap.
    They were probably all giggling over the 2000 Bush campaign's "McCain has an illegitimate black baby" story.
    They truly have no shame.
    
    Reply
    95 Replies
    - 0%
      rdy2rck6 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      Just curious MRCOFFEECAKE. Didn't understand. I surprise you.How?Just curious. Thanks
      Reply
      77 Replies
      - 0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Only surprise (not upset or shocked)
        because a vote in favor of a clearly malicious story at such
        an important time in our country's history surprised me coming from such a clear thinker.
        Apparently, this post is helping us redefine just what a "vote for" and a "sink" should/actually means..
        It tends to be a vote of support or discord with a story.
        In these stressful times the "vote" is even more relevant.
        I don't know if you disagree with my/our thoughts,
        but just look at the list who voted for that trash.
        Do you really relate to tanglang, Klarissa (who is pretty much the luvmyprez replacement) and dropkicklibs (who has been here under several divisive names)etc??
        The only ones missing are endo, capecoral, alfalfa and FSU.
        Was bobo there??
        Reply
        76 Replies
        
        0%
        rdy2rck6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Got you. Maybe I'm different, but I define "friend" as anyone whom I can have a civil discourse with as in my "Listed" friends many with which I don't agree with.I give positives to a valid point even if I disagree and rarely give negs. unless it's overly abusive, etc.I disagree with friends and not friends frequently but go by the individual comment.Just like the people you mention above. Sometimes I agree and many times I don't. That's how I define a friend.
        Giving a story a plus for me is a method of me saying I enjoy it OR bears investigation. That's why I am here today. It bears investigation to here the other side and if you notice I have way more comments today than yesterday and are not inflammatory either way. I want opinions and facts.
        EVERYONE is my friend unless THEY declare me enemy.
        Reply
        50 Replies
        
        AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.49 Replies
        
        0%
        rdy2rck6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        I agree AG. But there were harassing statements yesterday also. I'm just saying particularly in politics it goes both ways.Plus some would declare this story trash.
        Reply
        16 Replies
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Just look above your comment to Alpha's frustrated and defensive post and you see what kind of company you surf near when you vote "their" way..
        They need all the fumes they can get and they'll latch on to you if they can use your vote as a body..
        They're still ignorantly calling everyone a liberal.
        (The only word they know)
        You see????
        Alpha sees absolutely nothing wrong with a malicious post that is false about Obama, but we'd be arrested if we publicly
        state how GEORGE W BUSH EVADED THE DRAFT in 1970, yet has had the NERVE to send others to march off to their death!
        They support fabricated hatespeak but protect against truthful vital wrongdoing by one of "theirs"..
        Basically, they suck!
        They suck the oxygen out of fairness, and they suck as human beings..
        Hypocritical evil people.
        Reply
        5 Replies
        
        0%
        zaph226 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Those that went off to fight in the current war didn't have to evade the draft, and maybe you forget, they volunteered to serve, and when they signed up knew there was a chance of going to war, even if they signed up in peacetime, things change.
        As for hatespeak, have you ever called anyone you don't really know a neocon just because they are a conservative, insulted them because they don't agree with you? or are you being a hypocrite.
        As for this story, go look at my comments in the other story on this, the one that led to this one being posted, you might just find that I was amoung the first, if not the first to condemn this kind of story as trash, no matter which side it comes from. But hey, what can I know, I must be wrong and there must be something to the story right, after all how could one of us that suck as a human being possibley be right when we think a story like this is trash. So thans for your opinion, I stand corrected...
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        zaph226 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        And yes, if you missed it, that last bit about standing corrected was sarcasm, I still think this kind of story, and the kind of hateful comment you made while calling others hateful, are both trash.
        I'll probably get banned by the fairminded people running Propellor since I'm one of those hateful conservatives
        Reply
        
        0%
        Endoscopy6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        "state how GEORGE W BUSH EVADED THE DRAFT in 1970, yet has had the NERVE to send others to march off to their death!"
        Just like Clinton. Except that Bush was a fighter pilot in the reserve.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Bush went AWOL..
        Did Clinton send Americans off to die??
        Get real..just once ok??
        And get over the President from 1992-2000.
        It's 2008 and we have a bastard in the White House.
        Wake up!!
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Ever read the book or seen the movie Blackhawk Down? Now that was Presidential leadership!
        Reply
        
        0%
        tchef6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        I agree, I personally sunk the story, but just because you voted for the story doesn't mean you agreed with it. I have voted for stories that I don't agree with before and then let my position on the story be known in the comments section.
        It doesn't serve any purpose posting names of those who vote for certain stories. That is only going to lead to making this a very unfriendly place to be.
        Reply
        8 Replies
        
        AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.
        
        0%
        jovial6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        It's already common knowledge, but you can't fault someone for posting something that is available for all members to see. I think G is well within his rights to do so.
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        libsRfunny6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        "It's already common knowledge, but you can't fault someone for posting something that is available for all members to see. I think G is well within his rights to do so."
        If it's already there to see, then, clearly, the only reason the3 intolerant oaf posted the names was a VERY INTOLERANT AND SPINELESS ATTEMPT AT HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION.
        But, I am used to spineless, intolerant liberals on this forum and am not surprised in the least.
        
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Let's see, you have the right to post slanderous lies and filth that has no substance, but no one has a right to post those who in fact voted for it even though it's a mouse click away? Right. Some people are just so committed to their myopic divisive views, they will do anything to continue the hate. Anything.
        Reply
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        (((making this a very unfriendly place to be)))
        You mean ut can get worse?
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        LOL hey I think you'd call me an agitator since I don't walk in lock step with the left leaners here and love to give you a hard time,,,, I condemned it I also condemn this article and your little list of shame you've made up to try and silence others, yet you never once in the past did the same thing to your leftist buddies when they've put out soem pretty nasty stuff,,,
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Just because you hate Bush, you're not a lefty.
        Reply
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Those who we know as agitators will not condemn the disgusting article. They know what they PURPOSEFULLY sponsored with their positive vote..They got off on it.
        ANYTHING bad about Obama they'll encourage, but most important, willingly..
        ZLet them state otherwise in writing..
        (they won't)
        Reply
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        it goes both ways.Plus some would declare this story trash.
        It always does rdy 2 ROCK,,,,, now it's their chance to attack the accuser,,,, which is OK by me, it was certain to come.
        But you see, the same people that are so very upset about this haven't had one problem with all the trashy threads about any number of people on the other side of the political Isle,,, and they weren't very concerned with how 'true' any of the allegations were,,,,, I find it lacking,,,,
        Obama didn't do those things, a t least I'd not see him doing so, but hey like the allegations that Bush Killed 3000 Americans and a few hundred Iraqis to satisfy a blood lust and make a little folding money is far worse than what this nut is saying about Obama,,,,
        You'd think by the reaction by the left, you were at a Southern Fundie Rally and shouted Jesus was a Punk azz Fake or better yet doing it at a Muslim gathering and saying something like that about Mohamed.
        
        Reply
        
        0%
        gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        I didn't leave ANYONE off the list at the time that I copied it!
        AG - if you think I would do something as shoddy as that then you know nothing about me at all.
        But then why should you??
        As for harrassment - republishing information which is available for anybody and everybody to read cannot POSSIBLY be described as harrassment or have anything to do with the terms of use. I would be absolutely DELIGHTED if you would report me!!
        Reply
        12 Replies
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        Haters never need time to think..They just spew.
        We have another CLASSIC example with Alpha.
        These people have no time for details and are dis-interested
        in time consuming facts that require thought..THIS is how Republicans get elected..They can put quick fear, humor or one liners out there for the ADD-ridden ignorant and lazy flock to follow.
        They resent us for our attention to detail..
        Details confuse them..
        Reply
        11 Replies
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        "Hater" = Libspeak for dissenter who doesn't adhere to Liberal orthodoxy. Demonizes them into silence and submission.
        Reply
        5 Replies
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        LOL Drop so True,,, nextr they'll call you a Nazi that belongs to the KKK to try and shame you silent
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        good company you're choosing to keep!
        Reply
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        I keep the company I want to coffee,, at least my comapny isn't talking assassination like the company you keep yeah your group are upstanding for sure.
        Reply
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        bull..hater is a name caller...
        hater is a name caller who berates ANYONE who they decide to call a "liberal" because they disagree with ANYTHING that they believe challenge their "perfect conservative principles" or their "dear President".
        Hey, your hate has painted you into a very small minority in this country. (say about 21.8% and dropping)
        You know who the handful of haters are, in fact, that is why you are all in the minority here too..
        Get real..just for one day..Try it!
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        DropkickaLib6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Calm down...you'll choke on a piece of your own coffee cake. Chase it down with some of that Liberal Kool Aid.
        Reply
        
        0%
        Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        What motive do you believe was behind that post? You think that it is legitimate "journalism"? No nothing but hate behind that fellas, I don't care how you spin it.
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.3 Replies
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Oh, I hate (HATE) him...There is a reason.
        He has destroyed my grandfather's America, and people like you continue to be enablers..
        You have nothing to be proud of!
        Reply
        
        0%
        slate6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        OMG so your hate is ok but if someone decides to hate Obama for whatever reason,,, that hate is evil?
        Yeah just like any war Obama may end up getting us into will be 'differnt' because YOU think it's ok.
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        0%
        MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago
        
        Has Obama ruined your life, your country and the people around you??
        Your hate is ill-founded.
        My hate has a long track record that continues daily, unless your "kool aid" tells you that everything is just wonderful.
        By the way, as a matter of SUPREME importance:
        I didn't hate George Bush until AFTER he became President and
        started messing up the commitment to get BinLaden, still allow illegal entry over our borders (which is a SERIOUS threat)
        and went into Iraq while leaving Afghanistan unfinished..
        Did Obama do any of that??
        You just want to hate..I am forced to hate..
        Reply
        
        0%

Hello!

Larry Sinclair: Welfare Recipient? »

Scale of 1 to 10

Click Prop It to Raise Score

Read Full Story at dearmurray.com

Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 468

jovial6 months, 3 weeks ago

Aidenag6 months, 3 weeks ago

Aidenag6 months, 3 weeks ago

GWHayduke6 months, 3 weeks ago

crespi6 months, 3 weeks ago

DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago

Jaydee406 months, 3 weeks ago

DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago

Jaydee406 months, 2 weeks ago

DropkickaLib6 months, 2 weeks ago

Spadecaller6 months, 3 weeks ago

DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago

ghengisghan6 months, 3 weeks ago

Mdiar6 months, 3 weeks ago

slate6 months, 2 weeks ago

Spadecaller6 months, 3 weeks ago

slate6 months, 2 weeks ago

Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago

slate6 months, 2 weeks ago

bobo-in-texas6 months, 2 weeks ago

slate6 months, 2 weeks ago

bobo-in-texas6 months, 2 weeks ago

slate6 months, 2 weeks ago

libsRfunny6 months, 2 weeks ago

ConquerorWyrm6 months, 2 weeks ago

IcCaRus6 months, 2 weeks ago

gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago

PsychoHosebeast6 months, 3 weeks ago

Will13136 months, 3 weeks ago

Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago

DropkickaLib6 months, 3 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago

DropkickaLib6 months, 2 weeks ago

slate6 months, 2 weeks ago

Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago

Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago

Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago

blinkers6 months, 2 weeks ago

IcCaRus6 months, 2 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago

Mdiar6 months, 2 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago

libsRfunny6 months, 2 weeks ago

slate6 months, 2 weeks ago

AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.

injest6 months, 2 weeks ago

tehranchik6 months, 3 weeks ago

gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago

gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago

gamahuche6 months, 3 weeks ago

TheRealizer6 months, 3 weeks ago

1-2-Oscar6 months, 3 weeks ago

SonOfTheMask6 months, 3 weeks ago

lovermanComment removed: User banned.2 Replies

Radiofreeeuropa6 months, 2 weeks ago

lovermanComment removed: User banned.

PsychoHosebeast6 months, 3 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago

rdy2rck6 months, 3 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago

rdy2rck6 months, 3 weeks ago

AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.49 Replies

rdy2rck6 months, 3 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 3 weeks ago

zaph226 months, 3 weeks ago

zaph226 months, 3 weeks ago

Endoscopy6 months, 2 weeks ago

MRCOFFEECAKE6 months, 2 weeks ago

DropkickaLib6 months, 2 weeks ago